Nobel Peace Prize 2002

Nobel Peace Prize

The 1973 Nobel Peace Prize winner was Le Doc Tho, the North Vietnamese Communist, who, along with Ho Chi Minh and other Party leaders, imposed a vicious Communist dictatorship in North Vietnam that slaughtered at least 50,000 Vietnamese in the 1950s and then invaded South Vietnam. The death toll by that Communist dictatorship totaled 2 million. The 1994 prize went to Yassar Arafat, the brutal dictator of the Palestinian Authority, who imposed a despotic regime on his own people and initiated a murderous war against the free citizens of Israel. This years Nobel Peace Prize was awarded to former President Jimmy Carter. The five member committee, solemnly intoned: “In a situation currently marked by threats of the use of power, Carter has stood by the principles that conflicts must as far as possible be resolved through mediation and international cooperation based on international law, respect for human rights and international development.” Was this the criteria in 1973 and 1994?

During President Carter’s term of office: The Sandinistas seized Nicaragua and used it as a base to assist anti-American guerillas in El Salvador. Iranians overthrew the pro–American Shah, installed a revolutionary Islamic regime, and in an egregious violation of human rights and international law seized U.S. diplomats and held them as hostages. The USSR installed SS-20 missiles in its then satellites and invaded Afghanistan. These were not years of peace and tranquility.

All told, Carter’s “principles that conflicts must as far as possible be resolved through mediation and international cooperation based on international law” created a world that was far more unstable than the one he inherited. If that achievement is the one the Nobel Prize Committee wants emulated, they would have been well advised not to make the award. Carter did manage to convince Egypt to recognize Israel’s right to exist but he did not receive the award for this notable effort. (We support his legacy to the tune of $2 billion a year.) Jimmy Carter won the prize for his intervention with the North Korean dictator Kim Il Sung. At the time, Carter said about the brutal Stalinist dictator, “I found him to be vigorous, intelligent, surprisingly well-informed about the technical issues and in charge of the decisions about this country.”

The police state of North Korea is a dictatorship that starves its people while feeding its million-man army. It sells ballistic missiles to our enemies and it builds nuclear weapons. Jonah Goldberg described Carter’s intervention in the May 15, 2002 issue of the Washington Times as “bollixing up then-President Clinton’s efforts to stop nuclear proliferation in North Korea.”

On October 25, 2002 Charles Krauthammer wrote in the Washington Post, “One of the proudest achievements of the Clinton administration was the Agreed Framework with North Korea. Clinton assured us that it froze the North Korean nuclear program. North Korea gave us a piece of paper promising to freeze; we gave North Korea 500,000 tons of free oil every year and set about building – also free – two huge $ 2 billion nuclear power plants that supposedly could be used only to produce electricity. Japan and South Korea were induced to give tons of foreign aid as well…” Eight years later, we learn that a signed agreement has been ignored.

Paper diplomacy such as the North Korean fiasco or the Oslo “peace” between Israel and the Palestinians mean nothing when a dictator renews violence. Written agreements with Kim Il Sung, Yassar Arafat, or Saddam Hussein are worthless. When it comes to al Qaeda and terrorism, to Iraq, to North Korea, no accommodation or negotiation is possible. Political courage, a.k.a. leadership, the will to use force against those who initiate the use of force, is required.

The committee may have looked at the imams and mullahs around the world however the voices of high religious authority in Muslim communities have been deafening silent in the wake of 911. In the 1990s America rescued a beleaguered Islamic people: Kuwait, Bosnia, Kosovo. We have just liberated a fourth – Afghanistan. Who should be soul searching? Who should be atoning? Who should be reaching out for religious tolerance and acceptance? Carter may not be the worst choice in history for the Nobel Peace Prize. The question is who should have earned it in 2002?